<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pingudownunder.com &#187; canberra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog/tag/canberra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog</link>
	<description>my wierd little corner on this world wide interweb thingy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:24:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>gov.au Enters The Digital Age &#8211; not!</title>
		<link>http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog/2008/12/12/govau-enters-the-digital-age-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog/2008/12/12/govau-enters-the-digital-age-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canberra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuckwit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of you know I work in the Information Security area. You probably also know I am passionate about Australia. However, this post is not about the technical ineffectiveness of the technologies that have been proposed (which I will write later). This is more about the method in which the Australian Government is pursuing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of you know I work in the Information Security area. You probably also know I am passionate about Australia. However, this post is not about the technical ineffectiveness of the technologies that have been proposed (which I will write later). This is more about the method in which the <a href="http://www.australia.gov.au">Australian Government</a> is pursuing the implementation of those ineffective technologies. Yet another example of <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20071210-Australia-1-nanny-state-in-the-OECD.html">Australia &#8211; The Nanny State</a> (funnily enough, which is the complete opposite of the culture of the Australian People).</p>
<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t know (and, given the lack of reporting in the mainstream media about the subject, I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised), the Australian Government is <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_consumers/funding_programs__and__support/cyber-safety_plan/internet_service_provider_isp_filtering/isp_filtering_live_pilot">currently undergoing trials</a> to enforce filtering of &#8220;illegal and objectionable material&#8221; at the Australian ISP level. What does this mean in practice? <strong>They want to filter your internet access using methods that just don&#8217;t work</strong>, just like the governments of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2006/tc20060112_434051.htm">China</a>, <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DD163FF93AA1575BC0A9649C8B63">Saudi Arabia</a>, <a href="http://www.rsf.org/int_blackholes_en.php3?id_mot=92&amp;annee=2005">Iran</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship">many others</a> do &#8211; but without the people to validate what is being filtered properly.</p>
<p>Remember, this is the same population of civil &#8220;servents&#8221; that has made it illegal for you, the Australian citizen, to purchase fireworks without having to physically travel to Canberra. Which, of course, is punishment in itself.</p>
<p>The policy will be enforced by two levels of blacklists &#8211; one of which is mandatory for all internet connections, the other is an &#8220;opt out&#8221; for those who need their fix of &#8220;restricted&#8217; online porn, up to R18 level. However, even the <a href="http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib310554/isp-level_internet_content_filtering_trial-report.pdf">Government&#8217;s own trials have shown a shockingly high false-positive rate</a>, which means that the filters have <strong>incorrectly filtered innocent information</strong> even using the deep-packet-inspection technology that is quite advanced compared to the URL-and-IP-address-blocking that you are used to when trying to get to Facebook from your work desk (and you already know how to get around that, don&#8217;t you?)</p>
<p>ACMA have not detailed the governence around this &#8220;solution&#8221;. And where does it stop? What will stop <em>Big Media</em> (the Music and Movie industries) from lobbying &#8211; hard &#8211; to block all technologies used to distribute files online, because they *might* be used to distribute Rhianna&#8217;s latest album? (Hint: get the videos instead, she is gorgeous).  What else will they add? Any websites or people critical of Government policies, similar to the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2842493.stm"><em>Freedom Fries</em></a> debacle of the US Government when France refused, correctly I might add, to support the invasion of Iraq based upon f<a href="http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=262">ailed intelligence about WMDs</a>? Given the <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2008/s2441546.htm">Australian Government&#8217;s useless performance</a> at yesterdays climate change talks, I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised that most environmental groups suddenly have their websites filtered due to lobbying by the Resources sector.</p>
<p>I tried to make an <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_business/industry_development/digital_economy/future_directions_blog/topics/minister_tanners_welcome/pingudownunder">argument</a> on the <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_business/industry_development/digital_economy/future_directions_blog/topics/minister_tanners_welcome/pingudownunder">government&#8217;s consultation blog</a> about this, but must admit I got into one of my infamous rants that also included Telstra&#8217;s ablility to slow down the information economy. But I was also happy to see that many other Australians have found the blog and submitted similar messages. Many more have also <a href="http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNet/442">signed petitions</a> and will be attending <a href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/270637/nationwide_internet_censorship_protests_planned_weekend">protests in each Australian Capital</a> tomorrow (Saturday).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/K_Rudd_MP/">Prime Minister Rudd</a>, I voted for you because I thought you would bring much-needed change to Australia. The Apology, and signing Kyoto were very good starts. But your Government&#8217;s recent actions &#8211; the lack of them in particular with regards to <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2008/s2441546.htm">Climate Change</a>, the l<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/10/2415264.htm">ack of action against the Japanese slaughter of whales</a> in Australian oceans, and of course the Great Australian Firewall &#8211; is starting to make me think that the other lot wern&#8217;t so bad after all.<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2001-02/02rn42.htm"> It is true that Australians do NOT have any freedom of speech protections</a> &#8211; something I think <strong>you</strong> should fix and protect our freedoms just like every other democracy. As a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Queenslanders">fellow</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queensland">Queenslander</a> I <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=3377295295">don&#8217;t want to stop supporting</a> you, but you are making that a difficult position to maintain.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; With regards to the Child Porn issue. I do <strong>not</strong> condone this. I would happily work with the Australian Government (contact me) on addressing this issue. My personal view is to set up a dedicated unit in the AFP (or similar) tackling this issue, to monitor, gather evidence, capture and prosecute each and every single cretin who is involved with this. I alledge (got that lawyers, I alledge &#8211; I don&#8217;t have proof!) you guys already have the technologies to do this, and in fact are already doing this, (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON">example here</a>), for National Security interests. Why not leverage the same technologies, resources and do something similar in the non-classified environment?</p>
<p>Back to the Child Pornogrophers &#8230; once these bastards are found guilty in a court of law, based upon the evidence collected asbove, I propose they are castrated &#8211; without anasthetic any medical support &#8211; using blunt, rusted, metal knives and left to rot in a cell. That is the minimum punishment that these sick bastards deserve. Lets stop this problem at the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pingudownunder.com/blog/2008/12/12/govau-enters-the-digital-age-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
